Which site? 21 Jun 09 , 08:58 AM

Which site?
21 Jun 09 , 08:58 AM

What new "site" are you talking about?? You mean the Reach Discussion thread on 'JOURNALIST MUST BE IMPARTIAL"?

There is nothing wrong with sharing certain truths if it is relevant. Just because they happen to be "christian" doesnt mean it cannot be shared. As long as its not causing religious hatred. Your comment is like saying only so called liberals can state their views because its "secular".

Not sure where you are coming from because your comments are rather confusing and contradictory.
--------------------------------------------------------
You guys go ahead to new "site", I not that capable.
21 Jun 09 , 08:39 AM

You guys go ahead to new "site", I not that capable. I tried to follow some of the postings and post some of my view points along that style, but Reach admin censored and removed them, guess they weren't good enough. It is ok, not that I am unhappy about the censorship, guess following the style of others is a repetition of sorts, that's why such comments have been removed. Best to leave it to more capable people to band together and protect our values for our future. Will support in spirit. By the way, just feel that some of those christian testimonies are more appropriate on your own christian website, which has been mentioned below, wouldn't repeat the url as it may be misunderstood as promoting that url. Thought best to write in secular way to convince people of the world then using religion to talk down to people. Oh yes, forgot to mention, very unhappy with Straits Times way of reporting recently, seems that the views and articles of one side is not reflected in equal proportions to other side.